How Many Hours Is Considered Internet Addiction for Baby
Ind Psychiatry J. 2018 Jan-Jun; 27(ane): 110–114.
Report of Internet addiction in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal control
Rupesh Enagandula
Section of Psychiatry, Vardhman Mahavir Healthcare, Patiala, India
Shipra Singh
1Department of Psychiatry, Dr. RML Hospital and PGIMER, New Delhi, Republic of india
Gaurav Westward. Adgaonkar
iiDepartment of Psychiatry, Smt. K. N. Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Bharat
Alka A. Subramanyam
3Section of Psychiatry, BYL Nair Hospital and TNMC, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Ravindra Yard. Kamath
3Section of Psychiatry, BYL Nair Hospital and TNMC, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Groundwork:
In the current era, the use of electronic media in the form of Internet has increased exponentially, particularly among children, and has led to their excessive involvement in Internet. In this context, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children were establish to have increased trend for this addiction.
Aims and Objectives:
The aim is to study and compare Internet addiction betwixt ADHD and normal children and the relation of demographic profile to Net habit.
Materials and Methods:
This was a cantankerous-sectional study including 100 children (l ADHD cases and 50 normal children without any psychiatric affliction as controls) between the ages of 8 and xvi years. A semi-structured pro forma for demographic profile and Internet usage using Young'south Internet Addiction Test (YIAT) was used. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS xx.
Results:
Net addiction among ADHD children was 56% (54% having "probable Cyberspace addiction" and 2% having "definite Internet habit"). This was statistically meaning (P < 0.05) in comparison with normal children where only 12% had Cyberspace addiction (all 12% had "probable Internet addiction"). ADHD children were 9.iii times more prone to the development of Internet habit as compared to normal (odds ratio – 9.3). Significant increase in average duration of Internet usage in ADHD children with increasing score of YIAT (P < 0.05) was seen. The incidence of Net addiction was more in male person ADHD children every bit compared to normal (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
ADHD children are more prone to Internet addiction every bit compared to normal children and thus crave preventive strategies.
Keywords: Adolescents, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Internet addiction
Children and adolescents these days are getting easy access to Internet. The use of Internet has become a must part of our daily lives. Easy availability of Cyberspace has problems of its own which psychiatrists throughout the world have started to notice recently. This has an addictive potential.
While maximum makes the utilize of the Cyberspace in a controlled fashion, a progressive loss of the ability to control the frequency and duration of Internet activities emerges in some users. As a consequence, the excessive fourth dimension devoted to Internet use and the behavioral narrowing can atomic number 82 to serious psychosocial outcomes. This miracle is referred to every bit "Pathological Net Use" (PIU) by Petersen[1] or "Internet addiction."
Studies from different parts of the world propose that overall prevalence of Internet addiction in adolescents ranges between 2% and xviii%.[2,3,4,5,half dozen]
Cross-exclusive studies on samples of patients with psychiatric disorders report loftier comorbidity of PIU, for example, affective disorder and attending-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).[i] Cyberspace addiction is associated with ADHD, depression, and hostility in males, while it is associated with ADHD and depression in females.[7]
Teens with ADHD are at fifty-fifty greater risk for developing this coercion.[7] Adolescents who are addicted to the Internet are more likely than nonaddicted teens to engage in self-injurious behaviors such as hit themselves, pulling their own pilus, or pinching or called-for themselves.[8]
South korea considers Internet addiction as 1 of its most serious public wellness bug. Using data from 2006, South Korean authorities estimates that approximately 2,10,000 South Korean children (2.1%; ages 6–19) are afflicted and require treatment. About 80% of those needing treatment may demand psychotropic medications and possibly 20%–24% require hospitalization.[nine] Results reveal that, based on studies conducted in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Korea, in that location are near 12% of Asian youth who are addicted to the Internet.[10] China is likewise profoundly concerned nigh the disorder. Equally a event, in 2007, Prc began restricting computer game use; current laws now discourage more than iii hours of daily game apply.[9]
Internet addiction appears to be a common disorder that merits inclusion in DSM-5.[nine,11] Due to the lack of methodological and sufficient enquiry, currently, there are no specific guidelines for the management of PIU.[one]
Republic of india has a huge number of Net users, with an exponential increase of Net usage and online action by the younger generation as a principal modality of social interaction in the electric current era. A report conducted in Gujarat (Bharat) showed that the prevalence of Cyberspace usage among school-going adolescents is 98.nine%; however, the prevalence of Internet addiction was 8.7%.[12]
The data of Internet habit and associated elements however are not robust. This study aims at examining Internet habit in normal and ADHD children and its relation to sociodemographic variants in an Indian setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study pattern and setting
It was a cross-sectional written report carried out in the psychiatry and pediatric outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary care teaching municipal hospital, after obtaining institutional ethics committee approval. In the psychiatry OPD, a child clinic runs, particularly to address the psychiatric problems in children and adolescents.
Study participants
A total of 100 children, aged 8–16 years, who had access to Internet usage, were included in the study. 50 consecutive children from pediatric OPD who were ruled out for ADHD and other psychiatric comorbidities according to the DSM-v criteria were included as controls. Fifty consecutive children from child psychiatry clinic, diagnosed with ADHD according to the DSM-5 criteria, were taken in the second group. Any child having whatsoever unstable or chronic disabling physical condition was excluded from the study. The diagnosis of ADHD was further objectively supported through Conners' Rating Scales for ADHD. Children with any other psychiatric morbidity or chronic/unstable medical illness were excluded from the written report. A written informed consent from the parents of the child and assent from the child were taken before commencing the report. Interview was conducted by a single interviewer in a single setting.
Materials
-
Semi-structured pro forma: To capture the demographic and design of Cyberspace usage details
-
Young's Internet Addiction Test (YIAT.): Adult by Dr. Kimberly Young, information technology is a validated and reliable mensurate of addictive use of the Internet. Cronbach's α is >0.9.[xiii,14,fifteen] YIAT is a twenty-item questionnaire that assesses Cyberspace utilise in terms of the degree of preoccupation, inability to control utilise, extent of hiding or lying about online use, and connected online use despite negative consequences of beliefs.[16] Each item asks respondent the level of selected symptoms/psychological states which are scored as – does not use (0), rarely (1), occasionally (2), ofttimes (3), oftentimes (4), and always (5). The full score measures the Internet usage as an boilerplate user (score 20–49), frequent problems (score 50–79), and pregnant problems (80–100). As defined in other studies, we defined the "Internet addiction" group as YIAT score ≥50 and the "Internet nonaddiction" group equally YIAT score ≤49 and Internet addiction tin be farther subgrouped into 'probable internet addiction with frequent problem' group (when score is 50-79), and 'definite internet addiction with pregnant problems' (score 80-100).[1]
-
Conners' Parent Rating Scales-Revised Brusk (CPRS-R:Due south): To assess the severity of ADHD, the CPRS-R:S was completed for the patients. CPRS-R:South which has been used in this study has 27 questions and 5 subscales including opposition, cognitive problems, inattention, hyperactivity, and ADHD index.[17] Internal coefficients accept been reported in a range of 75%–90%, and exam–retest reliability coefficients with the 8-week interval have been achieved in a range of 60%–90%.[18]
Statistical assay
Descriptive statistics, Pearson's Chi-square test, and i-way ANOVA were used to clarify the variables.
RESULTS
Sociodemographic and Internet usage pattern
The demographic contour and Net usage pattern of the participants were assessed. The sample had a male person preponderance that is 74%, of which 43% had ADHD and rest (31%) were controls. More than than half of them belonged to the age grouping of eleven–thirteen years (52%), followed past 39% belonging to 14–16 years and residuum in 8–ten years' category. Sixty-nine pct of them belonged to nuclear family. Home was the most common place of Internet usage (78%); school, cyber cafe, and friend's house were other places where children used Internet. Near of them (55%) used Internet alone without any supervision.
Comparing of Internet habit between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and control group
Hateful YIAT score of ADHD sample was 50 and of normal children 30; this departure was statistically significant (P = 0.001). The sample hateful for ADHD children pointed more toward "likely Internet use" and that of normal children toward "average use."
Studying the distribution of the participants based on the grading of YIAT score, a large number (56%) of ADHD children were found in Cyberspace addiction range as compared to the number in normal group (12%); the divergence was statistically significant (P < 0.001). ADHD children were found to be 9.3 times more decumbent (odd's ratio) to get fond to the Internet equally compared to normal children.
Distribution of sample based on Immature's Internet Habit Examination
The hateful duration of hours of Internet usage in the normal and ADHD grouping based on their categories of YIAT scores is depicted in Table 1. The scores in the ADHD group show that children having higher scores on YIAT take higher mean duration of Internet usage, and the difference amongst the various subgroups is statistically significant (P = 0.002). However, in the command group, the departure is not meaning (P = 0.667). The average duration of time spent on Cyberspace is college in definite Internet addicts, i.east., 21 hours/week as compared to probable Net addicts, where it was 12.53 hours/week.
Table 1
Gender distribution and average elapsing of Internet usage with respect to Young'due south Net Addiction Test scores in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and command groups
Comparison based on gender shows that the number of male ADHD children (n = 25) in "frequent problem" category on YIAT scores is more as compared to normal children (due north = 3), and this difference is statistically significant (P = 0.008), suggesting that male person ADHD children probably take higher propensity toward Internet addiction. However, in case of female person children, no considerable deviation was observed [Table one].
Considering the distribution equally per the age [Table 2], at that place is statistically significant difference between the ADHD and the control group in the nonaddicted range of YIAT scoring, i.e., score <50 (P < 0.05). The number of children beyond the historic period grouping of 11 years (i.eastward., xi–16 years) using Cyberspace was although high, but it was non problematic or addictive employ. This could exist attributed to the agreement of how to use Internet according to the needs after a certain age. Similarly, the distribution of ADHD sample in the historic period group of 11–16 years is higher (although not statistically significant divergence) than the control group in the probable Internet addiction range (i.east., frequent problems). This effect could be attributed to the lack of judgment and impulsivity seen in ADHD children.
Table 2
Age-wise distribution of grading of Young's Internet Habit Test score in the study groups
Similarly, no statistically significant comparison was observed in family type, identify of Internet use, and usage (alone/accompaniment/supervision) with grades of YIAT score.
Discussion
In line with previous studies,[7,19,20,21] we plant that Internet addiction was higher in children who had ADHD (in the age group of 8–16 years), such that they are nine.3 times more decumbent to become addicted to Internet as compared to normal children. Ane such study including more than 2000 seventh graders having similar findings suggested certain plausible explanations for information technology: children with ADHD take lack of self-command and crave instant gratification, which is provided by Internet through selection to surf multiple participants simultaneously.[7] Furthermore, Cyberspace and social media temporarily provide an emotionally and socially safe platform to children to escape from their daily hassles and obligations, becoming a faulty coping mechanism for their stress and fears.
Previous literature likewise suggests that Internet addiction in ADHD children can also be attributed to behavioral and cognitive dysregulation. Behavioral dysregulation was observed in the class of deficits of attending, planning, working memories, self-monitoring, and judgment.[22,23,24] Net provides an ever-changing, multimodal ways of instant gratification with minimal delay fits into the cognitive model of ADHD children hypothesized past Sonuga-Barke.[25] In addition, excessive Internet usage is maintained over a long menstruum through stimulatory furnishings on reward and sensitization as ADHD children are hypothesized to accept low dopamine availability in the brain reward arrangement, which is overcome to an extent by dopamine secreted at advantage center post-obit the instant gratification.[26]
Nosotros constitute that male ADHD children had a greater propensity for Net addiction, which is in accord with previous studies.[19] This suggests that ADHD or specifically male ADHD is a potential risk factor for Internet habit.
Considering the elapsing of time spent on Internet, we found information technology higher in definite Cyberspace addicts, which is in accord with before studies.[21,27,28] A recent study having the like sample groups as ours showed like findings.[29] The prolonged hours of Internet utilise in ADHD children further reinforce the inattention, quick responsiveness, and instant rewards. Dalbudak and Evren found that severity of Cyberspace habit was related to the severity of the ADHD symptoms and suggested impulsivity every bit the mediator in this relationship.[30]
Thus, taking into prior consideration of ADHD features increasing Internet addiction and later consideration of prolonged hours of Cyberspace use consolidating inclination to impulsive, rapid, and hyperfocused reactivity, it could be inferred that ADHD features and Internet addiction may share a bidirectional relationship.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION
It is apparent that Internet addiction is higher in children with ADHD, especially boys, every bit compared to normal children. Thus, it seems imperative to watch out for Cyberspace use and possible addiction in ADHD children. The converse is also true that if a parent complains of excessive Net utilize, then information technology should alert a clinician to probe for comorbid ADHD. However, longitudinal studies with larger sample involving multiple sites including the possibility of effective Internet use in ADHD children to understand circuitous tasks and social cues could be explored and would requite more generalizable results. Furthermore, studies on limit setting, as far every bit time is concerned, may aid understand their specific needs.
Fiscal back up and sponsorship
Zip.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
ane. Petersen KU, Weymann N, Schelb Y, Thiel R, Thomasius R. Pathological internet utilize – Epidemiology, diagnostics, co-occurring disorders and handling. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009;77:263–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ii. Ge Y, Se J, Zhang J. Research on human relationship among internet-addiction, personality traits and mental wellness of urban left-backside children. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;vii:60–9. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Bahrainian A, Khazaee A. Internet addiction among students: The relation of self esteem and depression. Balderdash Environ Pharmacol Life Sci. 2014;3:1–vi. [Google Scholar]
4. Kormas G, Critselis E, Janikian Thousand, Kafetzis D, Tsitsika A. Take chances factors and psychosocial characteristics of potential problematic and problematic internet use among adolescents: A cantankerous-exclusive written report. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:595. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
five. Kamal NN, Mosallem FA. Determinants of problematic net employ among el-minia high school students, Egypt. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4:1429–37. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Sharma A, Sahu R, Kasar PK, Kasar PK, Sharma R. Cyberspace addiction amidst professional courses students: A study from cardinal India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:1069–73. [Google Scholar]
7. Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CS, Yeh YC, Yen CF. Predictive values of psychiatric symptoms for internet habit in adolescents: A ii-yr prospective study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:937–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eight. Whitlock JL, Powers JL, Eckenrode J. The virtual cut edge: The internet and boyish self-injury. Dev Psychol. 2006;42:407–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ix. Cake JJ. Bug for DSM-V: Net addiction. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:306–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Hechanova MR, Czincz J. Cyberspace Addiction in Asia: Reality or Myth. International Evolution Research Middle Digital Library. 2009. [Final accessed on 2017 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.hdl.handle.net/10625/38567 .
11. Weinstein A, Lejoyeux M. Internet habit or excessive internet apply. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010;36:277–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Prabhakaran MC, Patel VR, Ganjiwale DJ, Nimbalkar MS. Factors associated with net habit among school-going adolescents in Vadodara. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016;5:765–9. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
thirteen. Whang LS, Lee Due south, Chang G. Internet over-users' psychological profiles: A behavior sampling assay on internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6:143–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
fourteen. Widyanto L, McMurran Thousand. The psychometric properties of the net addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;vii:443–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Yoo HJ, Cho SC, Ha J, Yune SK, Kim SJ, Hwang J, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and internet addiction. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;58:487–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
sixteen. Young KS. Cognitive behavior therapy with net addicts: Treatment outcomes and implications. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;ten:671–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Kumar Thousand, Steer RA. Factorial validity of the Conners' parent rating scale-revised: Brusque form with psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 2003;fourscore:252–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD, Epstein JN. The revised conners' parent rating calibration (CPRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998;26:257–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, Wu HY, Yang MJ. The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of internet addiction: Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:93–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Ha JH, Yoo HJ, Cho IH, Chin B, Shin D, Kim JH, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity assessed in Korean children and adolescents who screen positive for net addiction. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:821–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Yang SC, Tung CJ. Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high schoolhouse. Comput Human Behav. 2007;23:79–96. [Google Scholar]
22. Schachar R, Logan GD. Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Dev Psychol. 1990;26:710. [Google Scholar]
23. Sergeant J. The cognitive-energetic model: An empirical approach to attending-arrears hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24:7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Cepeda NJ, Cepeda ML, Kramer AF. Job switching and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000;28:213–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Sonuga-Barke EJ. Psychological heterogeneity in Advertising/Hard disk – A dual pathway model of behaviour and cognition. Behav Brain Res. 2002;130:29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Blum 1000, Chen AL, Braverman ER, Comings DE, Chen TJ, Arcuri V, et al. Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and reward deficiency syndrome. Neuropsychiatr Dis Care for. 2008;four:893–918. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Chan PA, Rabinowitz T. A cantankerous-sectional analysis of video games and attending arrears hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2006;v:16. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P. Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Comput Homo. 2000;xvi:xiii–29. [Google Scholar]
29. Weinstein A, Yaacov Y, Manning Chiliad, Danon P, Weizman A. Internet addiction and attending deficit hyperactivity disorder among schoolchildren. Isr Med Assoc J. 2015;17:731–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Dalbudak E, Evren C. The relationship of net addiction severity with attention arrears hyperactivity disorder symptoms in Turkish university students; impact of personality traits, depression and anxiety. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55:497–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
How Many Hours Is Considered Internet Addiction for Baby
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198603/